https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762636 The HC allowed the petition directing respondent no.3 to pay interest under Section 56 of CGST Act, 2017 within one month. The court held that once refund amount was disbursed per communication dated 05.04.2024, there was no valid reason to deny interest payment to petitioner. The court ruled that inter se disputes between State and CGST authorities cannot deprive petitioner of statutory interest, and such disputes must be resolved separately between the authorities themselves. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762636 The HC allowed the petition directing respondent no.3 to pay interest under Section 56 of CGST Act, 2017 within one month. The court held that once refund amount was disbursed per communication dated 05.04.2024, there was no valid reason to deny interest payment to petitioner. The court ruled that inter se disputes between State and CGST authorities cannot deprive petitioner of statutory interest, and such disputes must be resolved separately between the authorities themselves. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762636