<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459161</link>
    <description>A plea that property belonged to a Hindu Undivided Family must be supported by specific factual pleading, including the basis of HUF formation, inheritance before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, or clear details of property thrown into a common hotchpotch. Vague assertions of an oral family settlement, unsupported by particulars and inconsistent with prior conduct such as execution of gift deeds as absolute owners and absence of official recognition of an HUF, do not create a triable issue. The defence was found vague and not bona fide, so no issue was framed on those pleas and a preliminary decree for partition was passed on the admitted shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459161</link>
      <description>A plea that property belonged to a Hindu Undivided Family must be supported by specific factual pleading, including the basis of HUF formation, inheritance before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, or clear details of property thrown into a common hotchpotch. Vague assertions of an oral family settlement, unsupported by particulars and inconsistent with prior conduct such as execution of gift deeds as absolute owners and absence of official recognition of an HUF, do not create a triable issue. The defence was found vague and not bona fide, so no issue was framed on those pleas and a preliminary decree for partition was passed on the admitted shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>