<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1391 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459168</link>
    <description>The MCA portal&#039;s toolkit was said to omit any registration field for advocates or their Bar Councils, despite the stated position that advocates may file incorporation documents under the Companies Act, 2013. The omission was treated as a matter requiring administrative consideration, and the respondent was asked to obtain instructions and place a decision on record. No final adjudication on the merits was rendered at this stage, and the matter was kept for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1391 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459168</link>
      <description>The MCA portal&#039;s toolkit was said to omit any registration field for advocates or their Bar Councils, despite the stated position that advocates may file incorporation documents under the Companies Act, 2013. The omission was treated as a matter requiring administrative consideration, and the respondent was asked to obtain instructions and place a decision on record. No final adjudication on the merits was rendered at this stage, and the matter was kept for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>