https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459158 The DB ruled in favor of the petitioner, a retired Book-Binder, directing the university to grant the revised pay scale from 1.1.1986, based on 'Equal Pay for Equal Work.' The court emphasized the university's obligation to uniformly implement the decision, despite delays in seeking relief. The petitioner was entitled to enhanced pension and arrears, limited to three years before filing the petition. The respondents were ordered to calculate and disburse the enhanced benefits within a specified timeframe, ensuring compliance with the judgment and upholding the petitioner's rights. en-us Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:59:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459158 The DB ruled in favor of the petitioner, a retired Book-Binder, directing the university to grant the revised pay scale from 1.1.1986, based on 'Equal Pay for Equal Work.' The court emphasized the university's obligation to uniformly implement the decision, despite delays in seeking relief. The petitioner was entitled to enhanced pension and arrears, limited to three years before filing the petition. The respondents were ordered to calculate and disburse the enhanced benefits within a specified timeframe, ensuring compliance with the judgment and upholding the petitioner's rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459158