<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 144 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762564</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking to recall tribunal order and hear case on merit despite low tax effect. Addition made by AO based on state police information fell below prescribed monetary limit in Circular No.3/2018. Revenue argued modified circular allowed hearing on merit for certain circumstances involving enforcement agencies. ITAT held modified circular&#039;s list of agencies (CBI/ED/DRI/SFIO/DGGI) was exhaustive and did not include state police department. Since addition was not based on information from specified enforcement agencies, circular exemption was inapplicable. Revenue&#039;s claim to recall order was misconceived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 144 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762564</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking to recall tribunal order and hear case on merit despite low tax effect. Addition made by AO based on state police information fell below prescribed monetary limit in Circular No.3/2018. Revenue argued modified circular allowed hearing on merit for certain circumstances involving enforcement agencies. ITAT held modified circular&#039;s list of agencies (CBI/ED/DRI/SFIO/DGGI) was exhaustive and did not include state police department. Since addition was not based on information from specified enforcement agencies, circular exemption was inapplicable. Revenue&#039;s claim to recall order was misconceived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>