https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459118 A request to delete a party from the array of parties does not amount to a waiver of the right to be heard, as it only asserts that the party is not necessary or proper. Allegations of suppression, manipulation, and inconsistent conduct in proceedings before the Court and the Company Law Board were tested against Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, but the record did not show any act scandalising the court, interfering with judicial proceedings, or obstructing the administration of justice. No criminal contempt was made out, and initiation of contempt proceedings was rejected. en-us Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:08:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459118 A request to delete a party from the array of parties does not amount to a waiver of the right to be heard, as it only asserts that the party is not necessary or proper. Allegations of suppression, manipulation, and inconsistent conduct in proceedings before the Court and the Company Law Board were tested against Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, but the record did not show any act scandalising the court, interfering with judicial proceedings, or obstructing the administration of justice. No criminal contempt was made out, and initiation of contempt proceedings was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459118