<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2354 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459125</link>
    <description>An unregistered agreement to sell may be received in evidence in a suit for specific performance under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, but it cannot confer protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The document&#039;s admissibility for that limited purpose does not decide its genuineness, validity, or substantive effect, which must be tested on evidence at the proper stage. A registered general power of attorney cannot be rejected at the threshold as insufficiently stamped or recharacterised as a conveyance merely by reference to an earlier agreement. The trial court&#039;s approach of marking the documents subject to proof and relevancy was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2354 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459125</link>
      <description>An unregistered agreement to sell may be received in evidence in a suit for specific performance under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, but it cannot confer protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The document&#039;s admissibility for that limited purpose does not decide its genuineness, validity, or substantive effect, which must be tested on evidence at the proper stage. A registered general power of attorney cannot be rejected at the threshold as insufficiently stamped or recharacterised as a conveyance merely by reference to an earlier agreement. The trial court&#039;s approach of marking the documents subject to proof and relevancy was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>