<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1449 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459132</link>
    <description>The sole appellant&#039;s death was proved by a death certificate placed on record, and the Revenue raised no objection. Applying Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, the Tribunal held that the appeal could not continue after the appellant&#039;s death and therefore abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1449 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459132</link>
      <description>The sole appellant&#039;s death was proved by a death certificate placed on record, and the Revenue raised no objection. Applying Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, the Tribunal held that the appeal could not continue after the appellant&#039;s death and therefore abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>