<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1448 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459139</link>
    <description>Cash deposits of specified bank notes made after demonetisation, though claimed as business sales proceeds, were treated as unexplained money where the notes had ceased to be legal tender from 9 November 2016. Receipt of such currency in trade after that date could not substantiate the claimed source of deposits. The deposits therefore fell within the scope of unexplained money under section 69A and attracted taxation under section 115BBE. The addition and consequential tax treatment were upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 10:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1448 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459139</link>
      <description>Cash deposits of specified bank notes made after demonetisation, though claimed as business sales proceeds, were treated as unexplained money where the notes had ceased to be legal tender from 9 November 2016. Receipt of such currency in trade after that date could not substantiate the claimed source of deposits. The deposits therefore fell within the scope of unexplained money under section 69A and attracted taxation under section 115BBE. The addition and consequential tax treatment were upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>