<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1504 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459145</link>
    <description>Unexplained inordinate delay and laches can justify refusal of discretionary writ relief under Article 226 against income-tax statutory notices and reassessment proceedings. Here, the petition challenged a Section 148A(d) order, a Section 148 notice and reassessment action after nearly one year without explanation, so the High Court declined to entertain the writ petition. The Court nevertheless preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy, permitting recourse to an appeal before the income-tax authorities and, if limitation had expired, allowing the appeal to be filed within two weeks. All substantive rights and contentions were left open for determination in the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1504 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459145</link>
      <description>Unexplained inordinate delay and laches can justify refusal of discretionary writ relief under Article 226 against income-tax statutory notices and reassessment proceedings. Here, the petition challenged a Section 148A(d) order, a Section 148 notice and reassessment action after nearly one year without explanation, so the High Court declined to entertain the writ petition. The Court nevertheless preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy, permitting recourse to an appeal before the income-tax authorities and, if limitation had expired, allowing the appeal to be filed within two weeks. All substantive rights and contentions were left open for determination in the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>