<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1376 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459148</link>
    <description>Writ interference with an income-tax assessment was declined where the order was passed after notice, an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 246A was available, and no jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice was shown. The HC held that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used to examine the merits of the assessment when the assessee had an adequate appellate remedy, and the proper course was to pursue that remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:08:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1376 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459148</link>
      <description>Writ interference with an income-tax assessment was declined where the order was passed after notice, an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 246A was available, and no jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice was shown. The HC held that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used to examine the merits of the assessment when the assessee had an adequate appellate remedy, and the proper course was to pursue that remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>