<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39484</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the payments of Rs. 15,497 and Rs. 20,598 made by the assessee constituted revenue expenditures, as they were tied to profits and not a fixed capital sum. Even if the transaction was deemed an outright sale, the nature of the payments aligned with revenue expenditure principles. The court answered in the affirmative regarding the first question, awarding costs to the assessee in one case and making no order as to costs in another. The second question on the outright sale was not directly addressed due to procedural issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39484</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the payments of Rs. 15,497 and Rs. 20,598 made by the assessee constituted revenue expenditures, as they were tied to profits and not a fixed capital sum. Even if the transaction was deemed an outright sale, the nature of the payments aligned with revenue expenditure principles. The court answered in the affirmative regarding the first question, awarding costs to the assessee in one case and making no order as to costs in another. The second question on the outright sale was not directly addressed due to procedural issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>