<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules on Capital Gains from Property Possession Rights; Documentation Inadequate to Prove 2004 Family Settlement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83559</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in relation to the computation of capital gains arising from the transfer of &quot;possession rights&quot; over a property. The assessee contended that the &quot;possession rights&quot; constituted a &quot;capital asset&quot; and the transfer of such rights was liable to capital gains tax. However, the ITAT observed that the assessee failed to furnish crucial documents supporting the acquisition of such &quot;possession rights&quot; through a family settlement agreement in 2004. The ITAT noted discrepancies in the assessee&#039;s computation of the &quot;cost of acquisition&quot; of the &quot;possession rights.&quot; The assessee had computed the cost based on the registered valuer&#039;s report valuing the propert.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules on Capital Gains from Property Possession Rights; Documentation Inadequate to Prove 2004 Family Settlement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83559</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in relation to the computation of capital gains arising from the transfer of &quot;possession rights&quot; over a property. The assessee contended that the &quot;possession rights&quot; constituted a &quot;capital asset&quot; and the transfer of such rights was liable to capital gains tax. However, the ITAT observed that the assessee failed to furnish crucial documents supporting the acquisition of such &quot;possession rights&quot; through a family settlement agreement in 2004. The ITAT noted discrepancies in the assessee&#039;s computation of the &quot;cost of acquisition&quot; of the &quot;possession rights.&quot; The assessee had computed the cost based on the registered valuer&#039;s report valuing the propert.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>