<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762451</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding assessee&#039;s involvement in NSEL commodity trading scam. AO failed to verify Client Code Modification data, didn&#039;t inquire about assessee&#039;s regular trading history, and didn&#039;t investigate whether assessee filed complaints against NSEL scam. AO merely accepted returned loss without proper verification despite reopening assessment specifically for bogus commodity transactions. Assessee couldn&#039;t establish it wasn&#039;t beneficiary of scam or provide complete documentary evidence. Assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest as AO didn&#039;t address the core issue prompting reassessment. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762451</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding assessee&#039;s involvement in NSEL commodity trading scam. AO failed to verify Client Code Modification data, didn&#039;t inquire about assessee&#039;s regular trading history, and didn&#039;t investigate whether assessee filed complaints against NSEL scam. AO merely accepted returned loss without proper verification despite reopening assessment specifically for bogus commodity transactions. Assessee couldn&#039;t establish it wasn&#039;t beneficiary of scam or provide complete documentary evidence. Assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest as AO didn&#039;t address the core issue prompting reassessment. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>