<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 45 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762465</link>
    <description>HC directed government entity to reimburse construction firm the 6% GST differential paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months. Despite GST rate increase to 18%, entity had been paying bills at 12% rate. Entity acknowledged liability for additional 6% but sought state government approval. Court ordered payment with 6% per annum interest for delays beyond the three-month deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 45 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762465</link>
      <description>HC directed government entity to reimburse construction firm the 6% GST differential paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months. Despite GST rate increase to 18%, entity had been paying bills at 12% rate. Entity acknowledged liability for additional 6% but sought state government approval. Court ordered payment with 6% per annum interest for delays beyond the three-month deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>