<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39463</link>
    <description>Income arising to an assessee&#039;s wife from a partnership firm was analysed under the clubbing rule in section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decisive point was whether her admission to the firm and resulting profit share flowed from capital transferred by the assessee, or from her own status as an active partner. On the facts accepted by the appellate authorities, she was not admitted because of the capital contribution, and the link between the transfer and the profit share was too remote to justify clubbing. Accordingly, the wife&#039;s share of profits was not includible in the assessee&#039;s assessment, apart from the separate interest component.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39463</link>
      <description>Income arising to an assessee&#039;s wife from a partnership firm was analysed under the clubbing rule in section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decisive point was whether her admission to the firm and resulting profit share flowed from capital transferred by the assessee, or from her own status as an active partner. On the facts accepted by the appellate authorities, she was not admitted because of the capital contribution, and the link between the transfer and the profit share was too remote to justify clubbing. Accordingly, the wife&#039;s share of profits was not includible in the assessee&#039;s assessment, apart from the separate interest component.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>