https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762480 The Court recorded compliance with its earlier direction to pay the GST difference for the period 1.1.2022 to 30.9.2022, noting that the amount was paid in October 2024. It then held that a request to modify the final order through an interlocutory application to award interest from the original due date until actual payment would, in substance, amount to a review. Dissatisfaction with the relief already granted was not treated as a ground for modification by that route, so the application seeking additional interest was dismissed and the earlier order was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:50:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762480 The Court recorded compliance with its earlier direction to pay the GST difference for the period 1.1.2022 to 30.9.2022, noting that the amount was paid in October 2024. It then held that a request to modify the final order through an interlocutory application to award interest from the original due date until actual payment would, in substance, amount to a review. Dissatisfaction with the relief already granted was not treated as a ground for modification by that route, so the application seeking additional interest was dismissed and the earlier order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762480