<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762421</link>
    <description>The Gauhati HC dismissed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act for dishonored cheques. Petitioner issued two post-dated cheques worth Rs. 93,00,000 and Rs. 1,54,00,000 respectively under a Deed of Undertaking for GST payment obligations. The HC found the stipulations in the agreement valid regarding cheque issuance and determined the raised issues were matters for trial rather than grounds for quashing proceedings. The criminal petition was rejected and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 09:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762421</link>
      <description>The Gauhati HC dismissed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act for dishonored cheques. Petitioner issued two post-dated cheques worth Rs. 93,00,000 and Rs. 1,54,00,000 respectively under a Deed of Undertaking for GST payment obligations. The HC found the stipulations in the agreement valid regarding cheque issuance and determined the raised issues were matters for trial rather than grounds for quashing proceedings. The criminal petition was rejected and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>