https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459100 Observations and directions of a High Court that conflict with law declared by the Supreme Court cannot operate as binding precedent under Article 141. The Court reiterated that subordinate courts must apply Supreme Court rulings with due respect, and that reasoning inconsistent with governing principles on arrest and remand is legally unsustainable. The impugned judgment and subsequent directions were therefore set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration on its own merits, uninfluenced by the earlier observations. en-us Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459100 Observations and directions of a High Court that conflict with law declared by the Supreme Court cannot operate as binding precedent under Article 141. The Court reiterated that subordinate courts must apply Supreme Court rulings with due respect, and that reasoning inconsistent with governing principles on arrest and remand is legally unsustainable. The impugned judgment and subsequent directions were therefore set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration on its own merits, uninfluenced by the earlier observations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459100