<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459111</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred on issue of debentures was held not to be capital expenditure. The appeals raised an identical question to one previously decided in favour of the assessee, so the same conclusion was applied here. The issue was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 09:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459111</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred on issue of debentures was held not to be capital expenditure. The appeals raised an identical question to one previously decided in favour of the assessee, so the same conclusion was applied here. The issue was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>