<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 69(1) of CGST</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119436</link>
    <description>Arrest powers under Section 69(1) enable interrogation, preservation of evidence, protection of witnesses, and prevention of flight, exercised by the competent officer based on tangible evidence of fraudulent tax evasion; bail and punishment remain matters for the judicial forum. Detained persons must be informed of the specific grounds of arrest-mere issuance of an arrest memo is inadequate when accusations such as cheating or forgery are alleged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:35:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 69(1) of CGST</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119436</link>
      <description>Arrest powers under Section 69(1) enable interrogation, preservation of evidence, protection of witnesses, and prevention of flight, exercised by the competent officer based on tangible evidence of fraudulent tax evasion; bail and punishment remain matters for the judicial forum. Detained persons must be informed of the specific grounds of arrest-mere issuance of an arrest memo is inadequate when accusations such as cheating or forgery are alleged.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:35:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>