<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Revenue&#039;s Appeal on Reopening Assessment for Deemed Dividend, Favoring Taxpayer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83530</link>
    <description>The High Court examined the validity of reopening an assessment and invoking the extended period of limitation to add deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had purchased a property, receiving the entire amount from a company where the assessee held 29% shares. The court held that the revenue authorities sought to add a sum as &quot;deemed income&quot; through the reassessment order, which was unsuccessfully challenged by the assessee. However, the Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s order affirming the reassessment. The court observed that the department&#039;s attempt was to merely include an additional amount over the sum subject to the earlier assessment order, which stood deleted. Considering the appeal&#039;s withdrawal, the issue was construed as answered against the revenue and in favor of the assessee, implying a lack of tangible material for reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 08:41:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Revenue&#039;s Appeal on Reopening Assessment for Deemed Dividend, Favoring Taxpayer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83530</link>
      <description>The High Court examined the validity of reopening an assessment and invoking the extended period of limitation to add deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had purchased a property, receiving the entire amount from a company where the assessee held 29% shares. The court held that the revenue authorities sought to add a sum as &quot;deemed income&quot; through the reassessment order, which was unsuccessfully challenged by the assessee. However, the Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s order affirming the reassessment. The court observed that the department&#039;s attempt was to merely include an additional amount over the sum subject to the earlier assessment order, which stood deleted. Considering the appeal&#039;s withdrawal, the issue was construed as answered against the revenue and in favor of the assessee, implying a lack of tangible material for reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 08:41:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>