<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1338 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762352</link>
    <description>Duty liability on goods arising on debonding of a 100% EOU to DTA must be determined from the verified factual position and the excisable character of the goods. The demand on finished goods could not be sustained without fresh examination where the assessee relied on evidence of export or duty-paid clearance, and no proper verification was made. Semi-finished goods or work-in-progress were not subjected to final duty liability where their marketability and stage of manufacture had not been properly established. The adjudication was also vitiated because a relied-upon verification letter was not supplied and the export certificate was not considered, so the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure and examination of all material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1338 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762352</link>
      <description>Duty liability on goods arising on debonding of a 100% EOU to DTA must be determined from the verified factual position and the excisable character of the goods. The demand on finished goods could not be sustained without fresh examination where the assessee relied on evidence of export or duty-paid clearance, and no proper verification was made. Semi-finished goods or work-in-progress were not subjected to final duty liability where their marketability and stage of manufacture had not been properly established. The adjudication was also vitiated because a relied-upon verification letter was not supplied and the export certificate was not considered, so the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure and examination of all material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>