<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1339 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762353</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that demand for duty payment default beyond 30 days under Rule 8(3A) of CCR cannot be sustained. The tribunal relied on Gujarat HC&#039;s decision in Indsur Global Ltd. declaring Rule 8(3A) ultra vires, which was upheld after Revenue&#039;s SC appeal was settled through Lok Adalat. The assessee could utilize CENVAT credit despite payment default. Extended limitation period and penalties were also set aside as the primary demand failed. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1339 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762353</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that demand for duty payment default beyond 30 days under Rule 8(3A) of CCR cannot be sustained. The tribunal relied on Gujarat HC&#039;s decision in Indsur Global Ltd. declaring Rule 8(3A) ultra vires, which was upheld after Revenue&#039;s SC appeal was settled through Lok Adalat. The assessee could utilize CENVAT credit despite payment default. Extended limitation period and penalties were also set aside as the primary demand failed. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>