<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1352 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762366</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s decision to admit the corporate debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016. The tribunal found that financial debt exceeding Rs. 1 crore, including interest, was established through ledger accounts and demand letters. The debt was acknowledged by the corporate debtor&#039;s director in financial years 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19, with the last acknowledgment dated 01.04.2019. Despite the three-year limitation period expiring on 31.03.2022, the petition filed on 30.05.2022 was within limitation after excluding the COVID-19 period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022) as per SC directions in Suo Moto Writ Petition No. 3 of 2020. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1352 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762366</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s decision to admit the corporate debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016. The tribunal found that financial debt exceeding Rs. 1 crore, including interest, was established through ledger accounts and demand letters. The debt was acknowledged by the corporate debtor&#039;s director in financial years 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19, with the last acknowledgment dated 01.04.2019. Despite the three-year limitation period expiring on 31.03.2022, the petition filed on 30.05.2022 was within limitation after excluding the COVID-19 period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022) as per SC directions in Suo Moto Writ Petition No. 3 of 2020. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>