<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1357 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762371</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed appeal against refund claim rejection. Lower Authority had rejected export duty refund claim after six years without hearing, citing time-bar and failure to challenge provisional assessment order. CESTAT held rejection improper as assessment was provisional and order violated natural justice principles. Matter remanded to Original Authority for examination on merits after final assessment, with direction to jurisdictional JC/ADC to monitor completion within 90 days to prevent further delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 08:41:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1357 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762371</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed appeal against refund claim rejection. Lower Authority had rejected export duty refund claim after six years without hearing, citing time-bar and failure to challenge provisional assessment order. CESTAT held rejection improper as assessment was provisional and order violated natural justice principles. Matter remanded to Original Authority for examination on merits after final assessment, with direction to jurisdictional JC/ADC to monitor completion within 90 days to prevent further delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>