<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1398 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762412</link>
    <description>Kerala HC quashed provisional attachment orders issued under Section 83 of CGST/SGST Acts after expiry of prescribed one-year period. Court held that plain reading of Section 83(2) mandates attachment orders cease after one year, unlike Income Tax Act provisions which allow extensions. Revenue cannot issue repeated provisional attachment orders to circumvent statutory time limit. Court applied principle from Radha Krishnan Industries that taxing statutes must be construed on plain terms, effectuating legislative purpose. Repeated attachments would violate statutory language and permit indefinite continuation contrary to legislative intent. Petition allowed, attachment orders quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1398 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762412</link>
      <description>Kerala HC quashed provisional attachment orders issued under Section 83 of CGST/SGST Acts after expiry of prescribed one-year period. Court held that plain reading of Section 83(2) mandates attachment orders cease after one year, unlike Income Tax Act provisions which allow extensions. Revenue cannot issue repeated provisional attachment orders to circumvent statutory time limit. Court applied principle from Radha Krishnan Industries that taxing statutes must be construed on plain terms, effectuating legislative purpose. Repeated attachments would violate statutory language and permit indefinite continuation contrary to legislative intent. Petition allowed, attachment orders quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>