https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762415 The Madras HC found that rejection of Input Tax Credit was vitiated because the authority treated the transactions as bogus without dealing with the documents said to have been filed, including tax invoices, e-way bills, cess payment records, lorry receipts and weighbridge details. That non-consideration of relevant material showed non-application of mind, so the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration after the petitioner was given one final opportunity to file objections and supporting documents, with liberty to restore the earlier order if compliance was not made within the stipulated time. en-us Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762415 The Madras HC found that rejection of Input Tax Credit was vitiated because the authority treated the transactions as bogus without dealing with the documents said to have been filed, including tax invoices, e-way bills, cess payment records, lorry receipts and weighbridge details. That non-consideration of relevant material showed non-application of mind, so the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration after the petitioner was given one final opportunity to file objections and supporting documents, with liberty to restore the earlier order if compliance was not made within the stipulated time. Case-Laws GST Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762415