<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 38 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39443</link>
    <description>A search under section 132(1) requires prior satisfaction on relevant information, and the warrant of authorisation must be complete and specify the person to be searched; a blank or general warrant is invalid. A search and seizure carried out under such an incomplete warrant is illegal. Because proceedings under section 132(5) depend on a valid search and lawful seizure, an invalid search destroys the foundation for further action under that provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 38 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39443</link>
      <description>A search under section 132(1) requires prior satisfaction on relevant information, and the warrant of authorisation must be complete and specify the person to be searched; a blank or general warrant is invalid. A search and seizure carried out under such an incomplete warrant is illegal. Because proceedings under section 132(5) depend on a valid search and lawful seizure, an invalid search destroys the foundation for further action under that provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>