<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762288</link>
    <description>Delhi HC upheld disciplinary proceedings against a chartered accountant under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, resulting in removal from the Register of Members for six months. The respondent admitted signing share transfer deeds but claimed fraud by a broker&#039;s employee. The court found the explanation improbable given the respondent&#039;s professional qualifications and noted unexplained four-year delay in applying for duplicate certificates while continuing to receive dividends. The HC determined the Disciplinary Committee&#039;s finding of misconduct was reasonable, concluding the respondent failed to act bona fide in a manner unbecoming of the profession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762288</link>
      <description>Delhi HC upheld disciplinary proceedings against a chartered accountant under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, resulting in removal from the Register of Members for six months. The respondent admitted signing share transfer deeds but claimed fraud by a broker&#039;s employee. The court found the explanation improbable given the respondent&#039;s professional qualifications and noted unexplained four-year delay in applying for duplicate certificates while continuing to receive dividends. The HC determined the Disciplinary Committee&#039;s finding of misconduct was reasonable, concluding the respondent failed to act bona fide in a manner unbecoming of the profession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>