https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762289 In an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity, the Court treated Section 67 statements as inadmissible confessional material and found the remaining call records and mobile-app exchanges insufficiently corroborative to establish knowing involvement in concealment or trafficking. It held that Section 37 did not operate as an absolute bar on bail where the prosecution case lacked adequate corroboration and the accused had already spent about three years in custody without meaningful trial progress. The right to speedy trial under Article 21 was treated as a material factor, and continued detention was considered unjustified in the circumstances. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762289 In an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity, the Court treated Section 67 statements as inadmissible confessional material and found the remaining call records and mobile-app exchanges insufficiently corroborative to establish knowing involvement in concealment or trafficking. It held that Section 37 did not operate as an absolute bar on bail where the prosecution case lacked adequate corroboration and the accused had already spent about three years in custody without meaningful trial progress. The right to speedy trial under Article 21 was treated as a material factor, and continued detention was considered unjustified in the circumstances. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762289