https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762304 Delhi HC set aside Regional Director's order rejecting petitioner's application for rectification of respondent company's name under Section 16(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013. Court held that Regional Director exceeded jurisdiction by determining ownership of disputed "Panchhi" trademark between related family entities engaged in multiple IP disputes. HC ruled that Regional Director cannot examine trademark ownership or decide IP rights like courts do in passing off actions, as such determinations fall outside Companies Act jurisdiction. Petition disposed of with impugned order set aside. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762304 Delhi HC set aside Regional Director's order rejecting petitioner's application for rectification of respondent company's name under Section 16(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013. Court held that Regional Director exceeded jurisdiction by determining ownership of disputed "Panchhi" trademark between related family entities engaged in multiple IP disputes. HC ruled that Regional Director cannot examine trademark ownership or decide IP rights like courts do in passing off actions, as such determinations fall outside Companies Act jurisdiction. Petition disposed of with impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762304