<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762315</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation under section 32(1)(ii). The tribunal held that goodwill computed as excess consideration over net assets acquired following Accounting Standard-14 qualifies for depreciation, citing Smifs Securities Ltd. precedent. The AO&#039;s contention that goodwill was merely a balancing factor was rejected. The tribunal also allowed depreciation on distribution network and customer relations, finding these intangible assets were properly valued by independent valuers. However, the claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax was dismissed following Total Oil India precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762315</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation under section 32(1)(ii). The tribunal held that goodwill computed as excess consideration over net assets acquired following Accounting Standard-14 qualifies for depreciation, citing Smifs Securities Ltd. precedent. The AO&#039;s contention that goodwill was merely a balancing factor was rejected. The tribunal also allowed depreciation on distribution network and customer relations, finding these intangible assets were properly valued by independent valuers. However, the claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax was dismissed following Total Oil India precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>