<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1307 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762321</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that approvals granted under section 153D were invalid as the JCIT mechanically granted 39 approvals without proper application of mind. The tribunal ruled that approvals must be granted separately for each assessment year for each assessee, and the blanket approvals violated legal requirements. Consequently, all search assessments were declared bad in law and illegal, with all grounds raised by assessees being allowed across all assessment years under consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1307 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762321</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that approvals granted under section 153D were invalid as the JCIT mechanically granted 39 approvals without proper application of mind. The tribunal ruled that approvals must be granted separately for each assessment year for each assessee, and the blanket approvals violated legal requirements. Consequently, all search assessments were declared bad in law and illegal, with all grounds raised by assessees being allowed across all assessment years under consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>