<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1318 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762332</link>
    <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding demand under section 206C(1C) and (6)(7) for failure to collect TCS on illegal mining, storage and transportation activities, and failure to deduct TDS on District Mining Fund contributions. The CIT(Appeals) order was upheld as it correctly followed the precedent established in District Mining Officer, Bemetara case, finding no infirmity in the lower authority&#039;s decision to hold the assessee in default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1318 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762332</link>
      <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding demand under section 206C(1C) and (6)(7) for failure to collect TCS on illegal mining, storage and transportation activities, and failure to deduct TDS on District Mining Fund contributions. The CIT(Appeals) order was upheld as it correctly followed the precedent established in District Mining Officer, Bemetara case, finding no infirmity in the lower authority&#039;s decision to hold the assessee in default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>