<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1321 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762335</link>
    <description>Late fee under section 234E could not be levied through intimation under section 200A for quarters relating to financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14, because the computational machinery enabling such adjustment became operative only from 01.06.2015. The Tribunal noted that the first appellate authority had followed binding judicial precedent and found no infirmity in that view, so the relief granted was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1321 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762335</link>
      <description>Late fee under section 234E could not be levied through intimation under section 200A for quarters relating to financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14, because the computational machinery enabling such adjustment became operative only from 01.06.2015. The Tribunal noted that the first appellate authority had followed binding judicial precedent and found no infirmity in that view, so the relief granted was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>