<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39421</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed that the payment made to Dominit was for acquiring knowledge or an advantage of an enduring nature, thus constituting capital expenditure. The court upheld the decision to treat 50% of the fee as capital expenditure, based on the nature of the services provided under the agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:12:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39421</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed that the payment made to Dominit was for acquiring knowledge or an advantage of an enduring nature, thus constituting capital expenditure. The court upheld the decision to treat 50% of the fee as capital expenditure, based on the nature of the services provided under the agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>