https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459067 A writ petition may be maintainable at a Bench where part of the cause of action arose, yet the court can still decline to entertain it if another forum is more appropriate on convenience grounds. In a RERA-related dispute connected to a Nagpur project, the Bombay High Court considered territorial jurisdiction, the location of the project, agreement and payment records, the purchaser's residence, and the relative hardship to the parties. It treated maintainability and forum convenience as distinct inquiries and applied the doctrine of forum conveniens to prefer the Nagpur Bench. The matter was therefore not to proceed at the Principal Seat and was directed for consideration of transfer. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:27:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459067 A writ petition may be maintainable at a Bench where part of the cause of action arose, yet the court can still decline to entertain it if another forum is more appropriate on convenience grounds. In a RERA-related dispute connected to a Nagpur project, the Bombay High Court considered territorial jurisdiction, the location of the project, agreement and payment records, the purchaser's residence, and the relative hardship to the parties. It treated maintainability and forum convenience as distinct inquiries and applied the doctrine of forum conveniens to prefer the Nagpur Bench. The matter was therefore not to proceed at the Principal Seat and was directed for consideration of transfer. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459067