<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1490 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), affirming their status as an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal concluded that the lease deed relied upon by GNIDA did not qualify them as a financial creditor, as the dues were similar to statutory obligations. Despite arguments referencing a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal found no procedural errors in the original order and upheld GNIDA&#039;s classification as an operational creditor, consistent with a precedent involving the Noida Authority. The appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:18:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1490 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), affirming their status as an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal concluded that the lease deed relied upon by GNIDA did not qualify them as a financial creditor, as the dues were similar to statutory obligations. Despite arguments referencing a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal found no procedural errors in the original order and upheld GNIDA&#039;s classification as an operational creditor, consistent with a precedent involving the Noida Authority. The appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>