<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1179 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459075</link>
    <description>The Companies Act, 2013 framework treats auditors appointed for Government companies through the Comptroller and Auditor-General&#039;s mechanism as subject to Section 140(1) removal principles, while allegations of fraud or collusion fall under the separate Tribunal-led procedure in Section 140(5). The authority cannot bypass that statutory route by unilateral administrative action. Because removal of a statutory auditor carries civil consequences, notice and an opportunity of hearing are required before any prejudicial decision is taken. A removal effected without hearing is unsustainable, and the impugned termination and related communication are quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1179 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459075</link>
      <description>The Companies Act, 2013 framework treats auditors appointed for Government companies through the Comptroller and Auditor-General&#039;s mechanism as subject to Section 140(1) removal principles, while allegations of fraud or collusion fall under the separate Tribunal-led procedure in Section 140(5). The authority cannot bypass that statutory route by unilateral administrative action. Because removal of a statutory auditor carries civil consequences, notice and an opportunity of hearing are required before any prejudicial decision is taken. A removal effected without hearing is unsustainable, and the impugned termination and related communication are quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>