<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 21 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39412</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147(a) requires escaped income to result from the assessee&#039;s failure to fully and truly disclose primary facts necessary for assessment. Where the assessee had already disclosed the books of account and balance-sheet showing construction expenditure, the assessing authority was obliged to draw the proper inference from those primary facts. A later inspection report or higher cost estimate could not, by itself, establish nondisclosure or create a further duty to disclose additional facts. On that reasoning, the reassessment was held invalid and improper, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 21 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39412</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147(a) requires escaped income to result from the assessee&#039;s failure to fully and truly disclose primary facts necessary for assessment. Where the assessee had already disclosed the books of account and balance-sheet showing construction expenditure, the assessing authority was obliged to draw the proper inference from those primary facts. A later inspection report or higher cost estimate could not, by itself, establish nondisclosure or create a further duty to disclose additional facts. On that reasoning, the reassessment was held invalid and improper, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>