<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments Over Limit Allowed if Business Need Proven; TDS Credit Restrictions Overturned for Event Management Expenses.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83438</link>
    <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for payments exceeding the prescribed limit should be examined considering the business exigencies. If the expenses are necessary for running the business and the revenue has no doubt about the payee&#039;s identity and transaction genuineness, disallowance is not required. In the given case, the excess payment may be necessary for the event management business, so the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) cannot be sustained. Deduction claimed u/s VI-A in returns filed in response to notice u/s 153A/B/C is allowed, as the decision in CIT vs. Sun Engineering Works is not applicable to such returns. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings on this issue cannot be sustained. The Assessing Officer should calculate the refund of T.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments Over Limit Allowed if Business Need Proven; TDS Credit Restrictions Overturned for Event Management Expenses.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83438</link>
      <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for payments exceeding the prescribed limit should be examined considering the business exigencies. If the expenses are necessary for running the business and the revenue has no doubt about the payee&#039;s identity and transaction genuineness, disallowance is not required. In the given case, the excess payment may be necessary for the event management business, so the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) cannot be sustained. Deduction claimed u/s VI-A in returns filed in response to notice u/s 153A/B/C is allowed, as the decision in CIT vs. Sun Engineering Works is not applicable to such returns. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings on this issue cannot be sustained. The Assessing Officer should calculate the refund of T.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>