<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Allowed: No Evidence of Clandestine Manufacturing, Penalty on Director Overturned Due to Lack of Corroboration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83424</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal allegation - substantial electricity consumption cited as evidence - no other corroborative evidence found - Revenue failed to rebut appellant&#039;s claims - penalty imposed on Director. Held: Search commenced suddenly without notice, no chance for appellant to hide evidence. No raw materials, consumables, in-process or finished goods stocks found or recorded in Panchanama. Panchanama did not indicate manufacturing activities noticed during surprise visit. Revenue claimed six trucks carried finished goods, appellant countered they carried scrap from Kilns fabrication and installation. No clarity on when CPU was seized and whether Panchanama prepared for it, raising doubts on veracity of Revenue&#039;s claims based.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Allowed: No Evidence of Clandestine Manufacturing, Penalty on Director Overturned Due to Lack of Corroboration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83424</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal allegation - substantial electricity consumption cited as evidence - no other corroborative evidence found - Revenue failed to rebut appellant&#039;s claims - penalty imposed on Director. Held: Search commenced suddenly without notice, no chance for appellant to hide evidence. No raw materials, consumables, in-process or finished goods stocks found or recorded in Panchanama. Panchanama did not indicate manufacturing activities noticed during surprise visit. Revenue claimed six trucks carried finished goods, appellant countered they carried scrap from Kilns fabrication and installation. No clarity on when CPU was seized and whether Panchanama prepared for it, raising doubts on veracity of Revenue&#039;s claims based.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>