<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1218 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762232</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of an EOU that converted to DTA operations. The tribunal set aside demands totaling Rs. 15,88,21,859 comprising CENVAT credit denial (Rs. 10,77,05,805), Rule 10 CCR demand (Rs. 4,21,16,159), and PLA balance transfer denial (Rs. 7,89,895). The court held that registration of premises is not mandatory for credit availment, Rule 10 CCR provisions don&#039;t apply to EOU-DTA conversions, and no legal bar exists preventing debonded EOU units from availing credit in DTA operations post-conversion. The department&#039;s contradictory stance of accepting duty payments while denying credits was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1218 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762232</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of an EOU that converted to DTA operations. The tribunal set aside demands totaling Rs. 15,88,21,859 comprising CENVAT credit denial (Rs. 10,77,05,805), Rule 10 CCR demand (Rs. 4,21,16,159), and PLA balance transfer denial (Rs. 7,89,895). The court held that registration of premises is not mandatory for credit availment, Rule 10 CCR provisions don&#039;t apply to EOU-DTA conversions, and no legal bar exists preventing debonded EOU units from availing credit in DTA operations post-conversion. The department&#039;s contradictory stance of accepting duty payments while denying credits was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>