<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1221 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762235</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding disallowed CENVAT credit on business support services and DG set/tower dismantling services. The tribunal held that diesel procurement, transportation, and filling services for DG sets qualified as input services under the wide definition, being necessary for continuous telecommunication operations. Similarly, DG set and tower dismantling services were deemed input services as they were used in furtherance of the telecommunication business. The tribunal set aside credit disallowances and ruled that extended limitation period was not invokable absent suppression of facts or mala fide intent, particularly in cases involving statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1221 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762235</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding disallowed CENVAT credit on business support services and DG set/tower dismantling services. The tribunal held that diesel procurement, transportation, and filling services for DG sets qualified as input services under the wide definition, being necessary for continuous telecommunication operations. Similarly, DG set and tower dismantling services were deemed input services as they were used in furtherance of the telecommunication business. The tribunal set aside credit disallowances and ruled that extended limitation period was not invokable absent suppression of facts or mala fide intent, particularly in cases involving statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>