<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1234 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762248</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging rejection of Section 7 applications. The court held that share application money deposited by appellants with corporate debtor did not constitute financial debt under Section 5(8) of IBC. Key findings: financial debt requires disbursal against consideration for time value of money; share application money not expressly covered under Section 5(8) sub-clauses; no valid concluded agreement between parties for share allotment existed; amounts not advanced pursuant to private placement offer under Companies Act 2013; CADR Rules inapplicable without proof of compliant private placement offer. Appeals lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1234 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762248</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging rejection of Section 7 applications. The court held that share application money deposited by appellants with corporate debtor did not constitute financial debt under Section 5(8) of IBC. Key findings: financial debt requires disbursal against consideration for time value of money; share application money not expressly covered under Section 5(8) sub-clauses; no valid concluded agreement between parties for share allotment existed; amounts not advanced pursuant to private placement offer under Companies Act 2013; CADR Rules inapplicable without proof of compliant private placement offer. Appeals lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>