https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762249 Delhi HC dismissed delay condonation application for 4486-day delay in filing appeal against money recovery decree. Corporate appellant attributed delay to counsel's professional misconduct but failed to show sufficient cause for seven-year initial delay period. Court found appellant lacked due diligence as limited company with duty to track litigation. Section 14 Limitation Act benefit denied for subsequent five-year period as appellant filed Order IX Rule 13 CPC application without ex-parte judgment, demonstrating lack of good faith and due care. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762249 Delhi HC dismissed delay condonation application for 4486-day delay in filing appeal against money recovery decree. Corporate appellant attributed delay to counsel's professional misconduct but failed to show sufficient cause for seven-year initial delay period. Court found appellant lacked due diligence as limited company with duty to track litigation. Section 14 Limitation Act benefit denied for subsequent five-year period as appellant filed Order IX Rule 13 CPC application without ex-parte judgment, demonstrating lack of good faith and due care. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762249