<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1237 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority of Rs. 40,000 for the non-submission of documents under Regulation 5 was appropriate and proportionate given the circumstances, where the documents were eventually submitted. It set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to enhance the penalty to Rs. 50,000 per Bill of Entry, finding the increase unjustified and lacking adequate reasoning. The appeal was resolved by affirming the original penalty and dismissing the enhanced penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1237 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority of Rs. 40,000 for the non-submission of documents under Regulation 5 was appropriate and proportionate given the circumstances, where the documents were eventually submitted. It set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to enhance the penalty to Rs. 50,000 per Bill of Entry, finding the increase unjustified and lacking adequate reasoning. The appeal was resolved by affirming the original penalty and dismissing the enhanced penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>