<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1372 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459046</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal regarding exemption under Notification 5/2006-CE for gold bars manufactured at Hutti. The tribunal held that primary gold converted from any form of gold, including gold powder/concentrate obtained through physical and chemical processes from gold ore, qualifies for nil rate of duty under Chapter 71. The appellant&#039;s dore bars with 90-92% gold purity satisfied the notification&#039;s requirements. The tribunal interpreted &quot;conversion from any form of gold&quot; to include the manufacturing process from gold concentrate to primary gold, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s narrow interpretation that required pre-existing metallic gold. The demand for excise duty with penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1372 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459046</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal regarding exemption under Notification 5/2006-CE for gold bars manufactured at Hutti. The tribunal held that primary gold converted from any form of gold, including gold powder/concentrate obtained through physical and chemical processes from gold ore, qualifies for nil rate of duty under Chapter 71. The appellant&#039;s dore bars with 90-92% gold purity satisfied the notification&#039;s requirements. The tribunal interpreted &quot;conversion from any form of gold&quot; to include the manufacturing process from gold concentrate to primary gold, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s narrow interpretation that required pre-existing metallic gold. The demand for excise duty with penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>