https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459050 The Court dismissed the application for recalling the winding up petition order, determining that the allegations of misleading facts about notice service, the legitimacy of the claim, and the petitioner's competency were unsubstantiated. The Court found that the applicants had the opportunity to raise these issues during the initial petition hearing but failed to do so. Consequently, the grounds presented were deemed invalid for the recall proceedings, affirming the original order's validity. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:34:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459050 The Court dismissed the application for recalling the winding up petition order, determining that the allegations of misleading facts about notice service, the legitimacy of the claim, and the petitioner's competency were unsubstantiated. The Court found that the applicants had the opportunity to raise these issues during the initial petition hearing but failed to do so. Consequently, the grounds presented were deemed invalid for the recall proceedings, affirming the original order's validity. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459050